How Retirees Can Avoid Running Out of Money: The Role of
Longevity Annuities
Retirees are becoming a larger part of the population while
their capacity to fund retirement comfortably has been
declining. The population 65 and older, which now numbers
about 48 million, is expected to rise to about 73 million in
2030. Meanwhile, the portion of retirees with
employer-defined benefit plans that funds them until they
die has been declining and is now less than one out of every
10. Most retirees must fund their own retirement, and face
the risk that their funds will turn out to be inadequate and
they will be forced to spend the last years of their lives
living on social security alone.
Financial planners who counsel
retirees confront their fear of running out of money all the
time, and have developed some rules of thumb for dealing
with it. One is the 4% rule, which says that the retiree
whose assets are invested in well-diversified and
low-expense equity funds can safely draw 4% of the starting
value of the fund each year, plus an increment equal to the
rise in the cost of living in the preceding year. The
trouble with this rule is that it promises to work about 98%
of the time but not all of the time. Nobody wants to live
with a 2% probability of a financial catastrophe – we
purchase insurance on our homes to avoid hazards that have a
probability of occurrence that is less than 2%.
What retirees need is a type of
insurance policy in which those who die earlier help fund
payments to those who die later. In fact, this type of
policy now exists. It is called a “longevity annuity,” but
that is a misnomer because it is actually an insurance
policy. It insures against the risk of impoverishment from
living too long. The best way to understand how a longevity
annuity works is to compare it to a standard annuity.
In both cases, the consumer pays a
large one-time fee at the outset, and receives monthly
payments for the rest of her life. On the most common type
of standard annuity, the payments begin immediately. On
other versions, the payments are deferred for some period
but the consumer receives death benefits if she dies during
that period. On a longevity annuity, in contrast, payments
are deferred until some specified age, as late as 85, and if
the consumer dies before reaching that age, she receives
nothing. In effect, the premiums paid by those who die
before the deferral period are paid to those still living,
which makes it possible to provide those still living with
larger monthly payments. This transfer is what makes the
longevity annuity an insurance policy.
Here is an example. The retiree of 65
has financial assets of $600,000 that will earn an estimated
5% over his remaining life. If he draws $3,000 a month, his
assets will be fully depleted in 431 months, when he will be
100. That leaves a small probability that he will still be
alive at that point, and destitute. That small probability
can be a major source of anxiety.
To avoid having to live with the fear
of living too long, he uses $200,000 of the $600,000 to
purchase a longevity annuity with payments of $3,000 a month
beginning in month 121. While his remaining $400,000
of invested assets will now be depleted in month 196, at
that time he will already be collecting the $3,000 under the
annuity, which will continue until he dies. The spread
between the date when the annuity begins and the estimated
depletion date of the assets is the retiree’s safety margin
during which he collects from both sources.
The numbers
cited in the preceding paragraph are drawn from a
spreadsheet-based model of the longevity annuity developed
by my colleague Allan Redstone, and don’t necessarily
correspond to the amounts that would be offered by any of
the insurers who offer them. However, a quick comparison
with the amounts reported by
www.immediateannuities.com
indicates that the spreadsheet estimate is in the ballpark.
The market for longevity annuities will be discussed in a
future article.
The longevity annuity has much in
common with the HECM reverse mortgage in that both are
designed to ease the financial burdens faced by retirees.
How they might be used to complement each other will be
discussed next week.